Ciba-geigy pty ltd v lushof farms pty ltd
WebMay 5, 2005 · Die appellant, Ciba-Geigy (Ciba), is die vervaardiger van Folar 525 SC, n gifstof. Die tweede respondent, Van Staden, is n handelaar-verkoper van voormelde gifstof en die eerste respondent,... WebCiba-Geigy (Pty) Ltd v Lushof Farms (Pty) Ltd 2002 2 SA 447 (HHA) 1 Inleiding Pothier Contrat de vente (1839) par 216Œ217 meld: fiExcept in these cases of an artificer or a …
Ciba-geigy pty ltd v lushof farms pty ltd
Did you know?
Web1991 2 SA 1 (A); De Vries v Wholesale Cars 1986 3 SA 22 (O); Ciba-Geigy (Pty) Ltd v Lushof Farms (Pty) Ltd 2002 2 SA 447 (AD) 48. The influence of the Consumer … WebJun 19, 2015 · This position was confirmed in the matter of CIBA-GEIGY (Pty) Ltd v Lushof Farms (Pty) Ltd and Another 2002 (2) SA 447 (SCA). The facts of the matter are briefly as follows: 1. A farmer purchased …
http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAWCHC/2016/211.pdf WebJan 1, 2012 · In definition, concealed or untraceable defects during inspection by non-experts are known as latent, whereas those that can be discovered easily are called patent (Barnard, 2012; Sivanthan et al.,...
http://www.lawlibrary.co.za/resources/catalogue/case_citations/s.htm http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAGPJHC/2012/151.pdf
WebCiba-Geigy (Pty) Ltd v Lushof Farms (Pty) Ltd 2002 (2) SA 447 (SCA) • D was manufacturer of a herbicide – according to D, suitable for eradication of weeds in pear orchards • P bought herbicide, used according to instructions – suffered crop damage
WebSA 632 (D) at 641A, cited with approval in Ciba-Geigy (Pty) Ltd v Lushof Farms (Pty) Ltd & Another. 3 Devonia Shipping Ltd v MV Luis (Yeoman Shipping Co Ltd intervening) 1994 (2) SA 363 (C) at 369G. 4 1967 (4) SA 308 (C) at 310G. opinion that the question of whether or not the pleading is excipiable is arguable, it the papageno effectWebCiba-Geigy (Pty) Ltd v Lushof Farms (Pty) Ltd 2002 SA 447 (SCA) at 462. [24]It is our law, therefore, that the courts are not averse to granting such amendments where such amendments will not cause the other party such prejudice which cannot be cured by an order for costs and where appropriate a postponement. shuttle astronauts from new jerseyWebCiba-Geigy (Pty) Ltd v Lushof Farms (Pty) Ltd 2002 2 SA 447 (SCA) en: dc.description.citationssa: Bayer (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd v Viljoen 1990 2 SA 647 (A) en: dc.description.legislationsa: Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 s. 61 (1) en: dc.description.legislationsa: United Kingdom Consumer Protection Act of 1987 ss. 2 (2) … shuttle astronauts diedWebSep 2, 1991 · CIBA-GEIGY AUSTRALIA LIMITED. CIBA-GEIGY AUSTRALIA LIMITED (Company No: 520327) was incorporated on 02 Sep 1991 in New Zealand. Their … shuttle astronauts cockpitWebMay 5, 2005 · Fabrikant en handelaar se aanspreeklikheid weens verborge gebreke – Ciba-Geigy (Pty) Ltd v Lushof Farms (Pty) Ltd 2002 2 SA 447 (HHA) shuttle astronauts boardingWeb4-Geigy (Pty) Ltd v Lushof Farms (Pty) Ltd 2002 2 SA 447 (SCA) Facts The defendant was a manufacturer of a herbicide ... 4.Ciba-Gei gy (Pty) … shuttle astronomy definitionWebCiba-Geigy (Pty) Ltd v Lushof Farms (Pty) Ltd en 'n Ander 2002 (2) SA 447 (SCA) City of Salisbury v King 1970 (1) RLR 141; 1970 (2) SA 528 (RA) ... Donoghue v Stevenson … shuttle atlanta airport to athens ga