site stats

Cit vs. godavari saraf

WebOur attention was also drawn to a decision of this court in CIT v. Smt. Godavaridevi Saraf [1978] 113 ITR 589, where it was observed that an authority like the Income-tax Appellate … WebSuch a High Court being a non-jurisdictional High Court does not alter the position as laid down by Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the matter of CIT vs. Godavari Devi Saraf ([1978) 113 ITR 589 (Bom)] and as analysed by a coordinate bench of this Tribunal in the case of ACIT Vs Aurangabad Holiday Resorts Pvt Ltd [(2009) 118 ITD 1 (Pune)]."

V Green Furnitures And Fixtures, ... vs Ito- Ward7(2), Hyderabad …

WebSep 21, 2010 · ...CIT v. Smt. Godavaridevi Saraf [1978] 113 ITR 589, for the proposition that the Tribunal should take notice of the aforesaid decisions...prescription of the time … http://www.in.kpmg.com/taxflashnews/KPMG-Flash-News-R-K-P-Company-2.pdf saguache landfill https://reoclarkcounty.com

Archive - 08 March 2012

WebMar 8, 2012 · Godavari Saraf held that until contrary decision is given by any other competent High Court, which is binding on a Tribunal in the relevant State, it has to … WebApr 8, 2024 · (This judgement can be used and is applicable across the country. Decision of any High Court is binding on all subordinate authorities and Tribunals through out India untill contrary view is taken by respective parent HC – CIT vs. Godavari Saraf, Bom HC) WebWe are, therefore, bound by that decision in view of the principle laid down by the Bombay High Court in the case of CIT v. Smt. GodavarideviSaraf[1978] 113 ITR 589. As held by … thick denim women jacket

Advocate Amit Bajaj - taxguru.in

Category:DECISION OF ANY HIGH COURT BINDING ON ALL

Tags:Cit vs. godavari saraf

Cit vs. godavari saraf

Niko Resources Ltd. v. The ACIT.- Circle-6 - 2009-LL-0911-80

WebBy his order dated October 22, 1973, passed under section 140A(3), the Income-tax Officer levied a penalty of Rs. 800. 3. Aggrieved by the order passed by the Income-tax Officer, … WebMar 9, 2012 · In an old judgement but useful Judgment Bombay High Court in the case of CIT vs. Godavari Saraf held that until contrary decision is given by any other competent …

Cit vs. godavari saraf

Did you know?

WebFebruary 2015, passed by the learned CIT(A) in the matter of assessment under section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), for the …

WebHence they are covered by the ratio of our judgment dt. 16th June, 1992 in ITA No. 557 of 1991 in the case of CIT vs. Godavari Sugar Mills Ltd. For the reasons stated therein, … WebApr 8, 2024 · (This judgement can be used and is applicable across the country. Decision of any High Court is binding on all subordinate authorities and Tribunals through out India …

WebAug 25, 2024 · "Judgment Bombay High Court in the case of CIT vs. Godavari Saraf held that until contrary decision is given by any other competent High Court, which is binding … WebHeld That >>> Decision of any High Court binding on all subordinate authorities and Tribunals through out India, untill contrary view is taken by other HC... Case Law >>> CIT vs. Godavari Saraf...

WebAug 2, 2016 · In an old judgement but useful Judgment Bombay High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Godavari Saraf held that until contrary decision is given by any other competent High Court, which is binding on a Tribunal in the relevant State, it has to proceed on the footing that the law declared by the High Court, though of another State, is the fina...

WebJul 4, 2016 · Such a High Court being a non-jurisdictional High Court does not alter the position as laid down by Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the matter of CIT vs. Godavari Devi Saraf ([1978) 113 ITR 589 (Bom)] and as analysed by a coordinate bench of this Tribunal in the case of ACIT Vs Aurangabad Holiday Resorts Pvt Ltd [(2009) 118 ITD 1 (Pune)]. thick deposit found on the banks of riversWebIn this case, the assessee had received the order of the CIT(A) on 01.08.2024 and the last date for filing of the appeal was 01.10.2024, while the assessee filed the appeal on … thick dental floss threadersWebSep 11, 2024 · CIT Vs. Godavari Devi Saraf (1978) 113 ITR 589 (Bom) In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in disallowing exemption u/s 54F of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) with respect to renovation expenses. ... On appeal, the CIT(A) confirmed the order of the AO by holding that any investment made … saguache national forestWebThe Tribunal followed the ratio of the decision of this court in the case of CIT v. P. Muncherji and Co. [1987] 167 ITR 671. The Tribunal has declined to refer the above question to us … saguache mapWebSep 11, 2009 · CIT(A) dismissed, the appeal of assessee by holding that full and true disclosure of all material facts was not done by the assessee during the original assessment proceedings he held the re-assessment proceedings to be valid. Coming to the first argument of the assessee we find that the notice for reopening the assessment u/s 147 … saguache populationWebThe Tribunal followed the ratio of the decision of this court in the case of CIT v. P. Muncherji and Co. [1987] 167 ITR 671. The Tribunal has declined to refer the above question to us as the same is covered by the above decision. 4. In the case of CIT v. P. Muncherji and Co. [1987] 167 ITR, a Division Bench of this court has taken the view ... thick dental flossWebOct 12, 2024 · Godavari Saraf held that until contrary decision is given by the other competent supreme court, which is binding on a Tribunal within the relevant State, it’s … thick description betekenis